00:18:30 Ashley Carlson they/them: https://nagt.org/nagt/about/code_of_conduct.html 00:20:28 Beth Pratt-Sitaula (she/her): : ) - hunger fuzzy friends 00:20:33 Beth Pratt-Sitaula (she/her): hungry 00:20:46 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: Reacted to "hungry" with 😻 00:20:53 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Reacted to "hungry" with 😻 00:21:03 Don Haas, PRI: It’s amusing to log in just in time to see β€œhungry” as the only thing in the chat 00:21:17 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Yes, well I hope you brought snacks for all, Don! 00:21:26 Don Haas, PRI: LOL 00:22:31 Beth Pratt-Sitaula (she/her): Hungry as in hungry cat 00:23:42 Ashley Carlson they/them: I love your plants! 00:23:52 Dana Thomas (she/her): That's awesome, Kelsey - good idea! 00:24:16 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: Thanks! :) 00:29:58 Amy Weislogel: https://nagt.org/nagt/awards/JEDI.html 00:30:35 Amy Weislogel: https://nagt.org/nagt/awards/index.html 00:35:42 Katherine Ryker (she/her): https://nagt.org/nagt/awards/ta.html#nomination 00:38:59 Katherine Ryker (she/her): "evaluated HOLISTICALLY" is important for sure 00:41:34 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Funded through different mechanisms, but same award 00:51:59 Sammy (Him/His): Great point Katherine! 00:52:10 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Reacted to "Great point Katherin..." with πŸ‘ 00:52:15 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Reacted to "OEST_Nominee_Rubric_2021.xlsx" with 😻 00:54:12 Dana Thomas: Does anyone have suggestions on becoming a more prolific nominatOR? Do you think of it throughout the year, or take a day when the email comes in..? 00:55:13 Meghan Cook (she/her): I apologize but I have to leave. Great talking to you all. Happy to talk more. My email is cook431@pnw.edu 00:57:15 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: Replying to "Does anyone have sug..." I feel like the thought crosses my mind throughout the year but sadly often stays near the bottom of my priority list. 00:58:07 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Replying to "Does anyone have sug..." The School I'm in has an awards committee that keeps an eye out for opportunities, which is helpful. They can help identify/encourage local folks to write letters. 00:58:10 Dana Thomas: Replying to "Does anyone have sug..." yeah i feel like i need a system for myself to make it happen 01:00:15 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Caitlin, your riffing reminds me of the need for the academic interviewing resources page on SERC (https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/careerprep/jobsearch/interviewing.html) - there are some resources there about "preparing for the interview." Could we share "Preparing for a self-nomination" or "Preparing to nominate someone else" tips? 01:01:01 Caitlin Callahan (she/her): Yeah! Exactly! 01:02:09 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Maybe those could be cross-award. I'm also imagining a mock video interview where two people sit down to talk about one nominating the other for an award, reviewing the criteria, discussing the overall nomination package, asking who might be good letter writers, etc. 01:02:20 Dana Thomas: Reacted to "Maybe those could be..." with ❀️ 01:02:28 Sammy (Him/His): Reacted to "Caitlin, your riffin..." with πŸ‘πŸΏ 01:02:44 Caitlin Callahan (she/her): Reacted to "Maybe those could be..." with ❀️ 01:02:44 Beth Pratt-Sitaula (she/her): Thanks everyone! Gotta run!! 01:03:48 Sammy (Him/His): Reacted to "Maybe those could be..." with πŸ‘πŸΏ 01:04:17 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: https://nagt.org/nagt/divisions/2yc/oafa_nomination.html 01:06:36 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Outstanding TA award provides membership! :) 01:06:47 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: Reacted to "Outstanding TA award..." with πŸ‘ 01:07:10 Sammy (Him/His): JEDI award provides membership as well 01:07:28 Dana Thomas: On nominating people (it's taken me a long time to type it, lol) -- I'm tempted to say that i should sit down and make notes right after going to GSA or the Rendezvous...but that doesn't necessarily broaden aperture 01:07:42 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Some of the awards committees are here, but it looks like maybe not all - https://nagt.org/nagt/about/committees.html#awards 01:08:08 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Definitely not all - division awards aren't there 01:11:53 Dana Thomas: Anything at GSA or Rendezvous? "in real time" nominating (or start it) 01:12:34 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Meghan talked about this earlier, but maybe it would help to collate some comments from awardees about how an award has impacted them 01:12:51 Caitlin Callahan (she/her): Reacted to "Meghan talked about ..." with πŸ‘πŸ» 01:12:59 Sammy (Him/His): Reacted to "Meghan talked about ..." with πŸ‘πŸΏ 01:13:00 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: Great idea, Dana! 01:13:58 Dana Thomas: NAGT booth could have flyers - we will note that! 01:14:30 Kelsey Russo-Nixon: I have to go - thank you for the info and productive conversation! Nice to meet you all and see familiar faces πŸ™‚ 01:14:35 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Reacted to "I have to go - thank..." with πŸ‘ 01:14:40 Amy Weislogel: Reacted to "I have to go - thank..." with πŸ‘ 01:15:28 Don Haas, PRI: Christy V and I will be at NSTA in March, sharing a booth for PRI, the Paleo Society and Society for Vertebrate Paleontology. We can share info there. 01:16:14 Sammy (Him/His): Reacted to "Christy V and I will..." with πŸ‘πŸΏ 01:16:25 Amy Weislogel: Reacted to "Christy V and I will..." with πŸ‘ 01:17:01 Amy Weislogel: Thanks so much everyone- I hate to leave but I"m keeping a student waiting! I hope we can follow up on this convo again! 01:20:19 Don Haas, PRI: I’m going to sign off to get back to work on feedback on the draft National Climate Assessment. In the 1700 page document, education is addressed maddeningly sparingly. Unbelievably sparingly. Comments are due Friday. If you get a chance, ask that they add at least a section on education, if not a chapter. We’ll be talking about it tomorrow in the Advocacy Committee meeting https://review.globalchange.gov/nca5-third-order-draft-public-review 01:20:22 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Thanks, Ashley! 01:20:34 Katherine Ryker (she/her): Thank you for your ongoing advocacy, Don!! 01:20:52 Ashley Carlson they/them: Here also is a Webinar Evaluation: https://nagt.org/262029