00:26:29 ASCN: Lucas’ 2018 webinar: https://ascnhighered.org/ASCN/webinars/effective_partnerships/index.html 00:31:31 Ryan Banow (USask): TRESTLE 00:31:36 Kate Winter: STEM Central 00:31:39 Daniel McIntosh (UM-Kansas City): AAC&U PKAL 00:31:40 stephanie: Networks across professional societies (IGEN) 00:31:41 Karen: PULSE 00:31:43 Tara King: AAU Undergraduate STEM Ed Network 00:31:45 Colin McGrane: SEMINAL 00:31:46 Kate Winter: HHMI IE 00:31:52 Amy Chan Hilton: ASCN 00:31:52 Madhura: STEM Ecosystems 00:31:53 ASCN: NSEC 00:31:54 Amy Chan Hilton: aau 00:32:02 Amy Chan Hilton: RED 00:32:04 Mary Huber: TRESTLE and TEval are both part of Bay View Alliance 00:32:06 Melissa Haswell: QUBES 00:32:06 Karen: HHMI Summer Inst for Biology Teaching 00:32:08 James Schwabacher (NU): POD Network 00:32:14 Kate White, ASCN: Yep! We can do that. 00:43:22 Kate Winter: I love Friedman's Results Based Accountability -- awesome for working across groups 00:44:10 Mary Huber: Bay View Alliance began at Carnegie, inspired by the NIC model, but then developed its own ways of collaborating 00:45:10 Daniel McIntosh (UM-Kansas City): We are proposing to use CoTransf as a prof dev method to achieve sustainable STEM faculty adoption of good practices 00:49:27 stephanie: We used the Communities of Transformation vs. Communities of Practice in a project, to think about whether we were trying to get faculty to be change agents, or just be better practitioners. 00:50:11 Daniel McIntosh (UM-Kansas City): intersting! publication? 00:51:19 SUZANNE HIZER: https://pullias.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/communities-of-trans.pdf 00:52:04 Daniel McIntosh (UM-Kansas City): thx! 00:56:15 stephanie: Yes, that’s the one we used; it outlines features of CoT and we decided that they fit, and we were actually a CoT and not CoP. 01:14:49 Madhura: Help: Continuous engagement with community/stakeholders 01:15:08 James Schwabacher (NU): help: aligning shared values/interests across multiple stakeholders 01:15:21 Colin McGrane: Help: maintaining passion and drive for change 01:15:47 Madhura: Are there any collaborative change models that you would recommend that we start with if we are looking to change classroom pedagogies across STEM departments at a university? 01:15:58 ASCN: Webinar event page: https://ascnhighered.org/233483 01:16:21 Sandra Laursen: I work a lot with a community that was not assembled as a “project” or “initiative” but was grown in organic ways over time. So there has never been a good opportunity to make “decisions” about leadership etc. (some of the others have evolved more naturally) - To what extent do these frameworks apply to informally grown communities versus designed projects? 01:19:20 stephanie: Madhura, and others, I like the framework used by the Department Action Team project, which works with faculty within a department to sustainably solve departmental issues. Their principles can be applied to classroom pedagogy as one element of that change. https://www.colorado.edu/project/dat/research. 01:19:27 Daniel McIntosh (UM-Kansas City): You recommended CoT for previous Q, can u elaborate? 01:19:35 Madhura: Thanks for your answer to my question. Can you please spell the name of the reference you mentioned in your answer? Was it Andrea Kazer? 01:19:52 Kate White, ASCN: Adrianna Kezar 01:20:06 stephanie: The Communities of Transformation pub was put in chat earlier: https://pullias.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/communities-of-trans.pdf 01:20:19 Daniel McIntosh (UM-Kansas City): thanks!! 01:20:21 Madhura: Thank you! 01:20:34 Sandra Laursen: Thanks, Lucas and all 01:20:42 Mary Huber: Thank you, Lucas! 01:20:46 stephanie: Thanks for this, very nicely done! 01:20:49 Veronica Womack: Thank you Lucas! 01:20:49 Cathy: Thank you! 01:20:51 Ryan Banow (USask): Thank you! 01:20:52 Kate Winter: Thank you! 01:20:59 Colin McGrane: Thanks, this was great 01:21:09 ASCN: Webinar evaluation: https://ascnhighered.org/233485